this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
78 points (93.3% liked)

Slop.

746 readers
422 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Are Lemmy anarchists okay? How does this person have 24 upvotes? In what universe are anarchists NOT doing class analysis, (therefore) don't want to abolish capitalism, and don't want to fight archism?

Link to the comment

I suspect this is just because libs absolutely DESPISE comrade @Cowbee@hexbear.net and will upvote anything smart-sounding that supposedly addresses whatever is being discussed?

Also, gotta love the whole "I have this opinion and many anarchists will disagree and that's what anarchism is about". Like, buddy, you haven't read one book or talked to one anarchist IRL, let alone organized in your entire life.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago (12 children)

They largely admit as such, to taking a vibes-based approach that is individualism ad absurdum.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (7 children)

It makes me wonder if there is an anarchism of the 21st century. Something that actually logically works in theory and could be materially implemented. So at least if I come across another dork that wants anarchism-in-form-primitivism-in-action ism, I could at least point them in a direction for them to learn the most realistically up-to-date materials of their own worldview.

Then again that's just too far into the weeds even for me, and I'll just stick with saying "who's gonna build and maintain the roads"

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What I tend to point to is anarchist orgs doing mutual aid and community building within the confines of existing societies and trying to fill in the gaps with mutual community defense. The zapatistas reject the anarchist label, but I do support the mutual aid groups and whatnot that meaningfully improve the lives of their communities. I'm not aware of any broader systems that outright exist outside of the context of an existing society though, outside of small communes.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't think of anything either. Every scattered bit of info on actually-existing anarchist projects that I've read about have been mentions of experiments conducted in the Soviet Union by anarchists. Insofar as the closest I've heard of in the PRC has been the maoist communes.

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

Agreed, that's why I tend to acknowledge the ones that operate within broader systems in a prefigurative sense.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)