this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2025
167 points (98.8% liked)

science

23534 readers
476 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Diamond Open Access, and the writing seems reasonable: study

I'll note that, afaict, the kind of long term symptoms they describe aren't acutely dangerous: We still have lots of covid infections today and not much increased mortality anymore. (Edits for clarity)

Could a medical professional chime in? Does the study justify the rhetoric in the OP link?

[–] Spur4383@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m not sure how you are defining mortality, but in the US alone there was from March 1, 2020, through the end of 2020, there were 522,368 excess deaths in the United States, or 22.9% more deaths than would have been expected in that time period. That went drown significantly after the vaccine…

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistics_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_in_the_United_States (have not checked grokopedia for alternative facts)

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Apologies if my language is unclear. I'm takling about post vaccine, 2023+. Today rates of mortality are close to, say, 2018 rates as far as I'm aware.

My reasoning: there are lots of folks who do not keep boosters current, do not try to avoid disease. They treat it as a common cold. I would expect the current mortality numbers to reflect it if this was a mistake. (Edit: eg, the cdc data show essentially the same mortality rate in 2023 as 2004)