this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
34 points (100.0% liked)
Games
21273 readers
194 users here now
Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.
Rules
- No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or transphobia. Don't care if it's ironic don't post comments or content like that here.
- Mark spoilers
- No bad mouthing sonic games here :no-copyright:
- No gamers allowed :soviet-huff:
- No squabbling or petty arguments here. Remember to disengage and respect others choice to do so when an argument gets too much
- Anti-Edelgard von Hresvelg trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/games and submitted to the site administrators for review. :silly-liberator:
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
technically speaking, vigilantes are criminals. i don't think the game is saying, "getting in a law enforcement vehicle and pressing R3 morally justifies what you're about to do". it's more like, you're activating the "do reactionary murder missions for cash."
this is a game series where, if you're wanted for anything, including bumping into a cop car, the cops try to force your vehicle off the road with no regard for public safety and unload firearms at you even if you're unarmed with your back to them and there are civilians around. the game generally presents US law enforcement as trigger happy, racists, incompetent, and corrupt from top to bottom, so i don't follow the logic that ostensibly doing their dirty work in side missions is being endorsed as good or ethical. i've always interpreted the game series as deeply satirical of US institutions like the military, policing, and their abject failure to mitigate poverty or promote public safety.
as far as i recall, the vigilante missions first appeared in Vice City (though they could have been in GTA3, but i believe VC was the first to have a significant reward) and were optional, but required for 100% completion. once you advanced to a certain level in them, it was all heavily armed mercenaries in multi-armored car convoys so it was basically impossible to do the 20-in-a-row (or whatever) without the Hunter. which, really gives it away that the vigilante missions purpose is to be a maximum collateral damage killer.
I'm not saying the vigilante missions are intended to be unironic copaganda. They just end up feeling kind of iffy looking back on them almost 20 years later, probably mostly unintentionally- it doesn't seem like Rockstar put too much thought into them.
GTA Online had the bounty hunter expansion which is essentially the same concept but done in a way where it makes a bit more sense in the context of a GTA game
What do you mean iffy? The cops are evil and you're volunteering to be their dog.