34
Has there ever been a viable alternative to the phsycialist model of the universe?
(sh.itjust.works)
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
34 points (85.4% liked)
Ask Science
13871 readers
9 users here now
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes, the very specific behaviour of criticising you as opposed to criticising other people. It's an irregular verb: I make valid criticism, you crybully, he/she spews hate and gets emotional.
You need me to provide screenshots of your swearing and name calling pms to me, or can we take them on trust? Lol.
You think you're quite the clever scientist because you tell other people to provide evidence, but the evidence is right here in this conversation and across your post history! Lol.
I have already defined what crybullying is and explained how your behavior meets it and mine doesn't. You only think it's a double standard because you don't understand what the word means.
I can confidently predict that you 100% believe that this is true of everyone who argues with you online and absolutely never true of you!
You truly believe that it's everyone else that's being unreasonable and toxic, making wild, random accusations with no basis whatsoever in factual reality, whereas you're a virtuous truth teller whose opinions are based on firm scientific evidence all day every day! It's so one-sided that I find it amusing.
I'm not sure you did, or at least if you did, you didn't phrase it as a definition. Reading back over our conversion, I think "crybullying" is your made-up word for people criticising you and then not obeying your made-up rules for how they should answer your talking points. It paints you as a victim when someone calls you out and completely glosses over your original behaviour. You paint yourself as boldly calling out poor behaviour in others, whilst calling similar behaviours in them crying and bullying. Trump does that kind of projection too, but like me, he never heard of your made up term for it.
You can give it out, but you can't take it. And I was right in the first place that like that other user you're argumentative and bad at backing down.
You admitted that you're argumentative and yet here you are, utterly failing to back down on that point. Do you fancy admitting that you're bad at backing down too?!