this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
156 points (92.4% liked)

Science

5733 readers
171 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 48 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (10 children)

What a weird thing to take away from the article.

Certainly you can think of at least a few organizations tackling homelessness, untreated mental health disorders, substance use, relationship crises, disengagement from health services and conflicts with government institutions.

Seriously it's a single study into another topic. That's just how science works. I'll never understand when people get mad that a study exists and that it is somehow unable to cover every possibility of a complex topic in a single study.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I'm not mad the study exists. It's a useful finding. It's the framing of the article I object to. It could just as easily be framed that mental health treatment for men at risk or incarceration improves outcomes and is more cost effective.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 6 points 5 days ago (3 children)

At risk of incarceration for what

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Drugs, minor theft, any of the various excuses police use to lock up the homeless and those having a mental health crisis. Lots of options.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why did you bring homelessness and mental health crises into this? This article has nothing to do with either

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I literally posted a quote from the article where it talks about homelessness and untreated mental health.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)