Welcome to c/food!
The place for all kinds of food discussion: from photos of dishes you've made to recipes or even advice on how to eat healthier.
Animal liberation is essential to any leftist movement.
Image posts containing animal products must have nfsw tag and add a content warning (CW:Meat/Cheese/Egg) ,and try to post recipes easily adaptable for vegan.
Posts that contain animal products may receive informative comments regarding animal liberation, and users may disengage by telling a commenter that the original poster wants to, "disengage".
Off-topic, Toxic, inflammatory, aggressive debating, and meta (community rules, site rules, moderators,etc ) posts or comments will be removed.
Please be sure to read the Code of Conduct and remember we are all comrades here. Share all your delicious food secrets.
Ingredients of the week: Mushrooms,Cranberries, Brassica, Beetroot, Potatoes, Cabbage, Carrots, Nutritional Yeast, Miso, Buckwheat
Cuisine of the month:
not vegan but reddit continues to be a 
paradise. bonus points some vegan should slide in here and recommend the vegan comm here
These statements don't even really follow from each other. It's just stringing together words to justify a preexisting conclusion.
What part of "Nature is man’s inorganic body – nature, that is, insofar as it is not itself human body. Man lives on nature – means that nature is his body, with which he must remain in continuous interchange if he is not to die. That man’s physical and spiritual life is linked to nature means simply that nature is linked to itself, for man is a part of nature." Do these people not understand?
I'm not even a practicing vegan, but I understand how animal liberation exists as a link in the chain of all human activity that impacts nature.
But they are big fancy words, which according to reddit, means they must make the statement true.