Welcome to c/food!
The place for all kinds of food discussion: from photos of dishes you've made to recipes or even advice on how to eat healthier.
Animal liberation is essential to any leftist movement.
Image posts containing animal products must have nfsw tag and add a content warning (CW:Meat/Cheese/Egg) ,and try to post recipes easily adaptable for vegan.
Posts that contain animal products may receive informative comments regarding animal liberation, and users may disengage by telling a commenter that the original poster wants to, "disengage".
Off-topic, Toxic, inflammatory, aggressive debating, and meta (community rules, site rules, moderators,etc ) posts or comments will be removed.
Please be sure to read the Code of Conduct and remember we are all comrades here. Share all your delicious food secrets.
Ingredients of the week: Mushrooms,Cranberries, Brassica, Beetroot, Potatoes, Cabbage, Carrots, Nutritional Yeast, Miso, Buckwheat
Cuisine of the month:
not vegan but reddit continues to be a 
paradise. bonus points some vegan should slide in here and recommend the vegan comm here
I should not have opened that link and checked out one of the threads
These statements don't even really follow from each other. It's just stringing together words to justify a preexisting conclusion.
What part of "Nature is man’s inorganic body – nature, that is, insofar as it is not itself human body. Man lives on nature – means that nature is his body, with which he must remain in continuous interchange if he is not to die. That man’s physical and spiritual life is linked to nature means simply that nature is linked to itself, for man is a part of nature." Do these people not understand?
I'm not even a practicing vegan, but I understand how animal liberation exists as a link in the chain of all human activity that impacts nature.
But they are big fancy words, which according to reddit, means they must make the statement true.
Leftism is when nordic social democracy steal from the third world and gives me treats.
i draw the bare minimum line at being anticapitalist and broadly antinationalist (exception for liberatory/decolonial nationalism, and pragmatically not destroying your state while the US exists). a couple centuries ago i might have drawn the line at republicanism vs monarchism, and a couple centuries in the future if the capitalists are gone there'll probably be some struggles about how centrally organized the bureaucracy should be.
libs and so on obviously don't use my definition because it would correctly position them as right-wing.
i'm handwaving all social issues here obviously. A place like Burkina Faso needs the chance to follow Cuba's footsteps on queer rights and so on. In the future people may look back aghast on the AES of the 20th and 21st centuries for their carnism but i can't stand up and honestly say that i think veganism is inherent to leftism when it's not inherent to AES, not even Kerala.
When I use it, I refer broadly to the tendency toward democratization and away from oligarchic dominance, in keeping with the French Revolution origins of 'right' and 'left'
The groups you've named all truncate or abandon democratization in order to preserve privilege.
what's nafo mean
NATO enthusiasts who often couch their imperialism in left-sounding rhetoric. They cheerlead for the nazi kiev regime.
I envy you for not knowing tbh.
NAFO stands for North Atlantic ~~Fascist~~ Fellas Organization, basically a bunch of NATO bootlickers on Twitter with dog profile pictures.
where does it fucking rise from then? are the fascists caring about animals now???