this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
19 points (95.2% liked)

Canada

10697 readers
452 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The agreement stresses that this pipeline will be privately constructed and financed — unlike the publicly owned Trans Mountain — and the intention is to have some Indigenous co-ownership.

That ["project of 'national interest'"] designation means the pipeline — and possibly the tankers associated with transporting the oil — could be exempted from some federal laws. Those include the Fisheries Act, the Species At Risk Act and the Impact Assessment Act, among others.

Canada is committing to "collaborate with Alberta to provide a clear and efficient approval process for the Alberta bitumen pipeline."

Importantly, Alberta is promising to "collaborate with B.C. to ensure British Columbians share substantial economic and financial benefits of the proposed pipeline."

Ottawa will also suspend the proposed federal oil and gas emissions cap and Alberta's requirements under the Clean Electricity Regulations (CER).

But the two sides are committed to increasing the industrial carbon price in the province — moving it from $95 a tonne now to a minimum of $130 a tonne. The federal government had previously demanded that price rise to $170 a tonne by 2030.

Both sides say they are committed to net-zero by 2050, despite the MOU that has the potential to turbocharge conventional energy production.

To help achieve that goal, both Canada and Alberta are moving ahead with Pathways Plus, an Alberta-based carbon capture, utilization and storage project, which could reduce the emissions intensity of exports from the province's oilsands.

The two sides are also agreeing to dramatically lower methane emissions associated with the oil patch — a 75 per cent reduction target relative to 2014 emissions levels by 2035.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Full text, since it's short.

This time around, no notes. Carney hit on something brilliant, and has gotten the Alberta UCP to raise the carbon tax, build CCS and abandon their main message with popular appeal, all in exchange for a pipe dream that BC and the coastal FNs will never allow.

Actually, one note. He just had to shoehorn in AI somehow.

[–] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This seems to be the deadline on how this turns out for the pipeline. I'd save the positive comments of Carney till then.

There's actually a fair bit of other to stuff to decifer in the docs as well.

The application for this pipeline project will be ready to submit to the Major Projects Office on or before July 1, 2026.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm not sure why that's unclear. Alberta will definitely have something ready to submit; the deadline is just there for the sake of completeness. The Major Projects Office can't make BC and FNs agree to it once it's submitted.

If it falls apart before April when the new pricing comes in, that's another matter. But even then the federal government hasn't lost anything.