this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
20 points (79.4% liked)
Progressive Politics
3762 readers
758 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
https://socialisttribune.substack.com/p/why-we-should-not-endorse-chi-osse
"Not knowing what he was getting into" is absolute horseshit.
Having connections higher up is not a good basis for endorsing and devoting resources to someone who only rejoined for explicitly opportunist purposes (free labour for my personal campaign).
It's no different, and Mamdani was a member and active part of DSA five years ago, and remained such, hence why he was able to get far more backing.
But it's wild to use Mamdani as reason to back Osse whilst criticising and attacking Mamdani, who has more of a background working in and with DSA than Osse, who has literally rejoined for opportunist purposes by his own admission.
I don't see how your quote contradicts "not knowing what he was getting into". Leaving so soon after joining for non-alignment sounds like he thought the DSA was something that aligned when he first joined.
Sorry, that's not what I meant. I meant more "life experiences that influence beliefs at a personal level".
That could either mean what you're inferring or that the DSA allows quality pluralism in its members' beliefs. Mamdani back then did not have the influence within the DSA he has now.
You would notice from my other reply that I only hold one of these contrary beliefs.