this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
64 points (97.1% liked)
Asklemmy
51399 readers
634 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What's the advice?
Crucial Conversations — Summary
A crucial conversation is any conversation where
The book teaches how to stay effective, curious, and collaborative even when it’s hard.
Before opening your mouth, check your intent.
Ask yourself three grounding questions:
This interrupts reactive fight-flight patterns and restores internal alignment.
Crucial conversations become unsafe when people sense judgment, coercion, or disrespect.
Detect early signs:
The moment safety drops, the conversation stops mattering—only self-protection matters.
You restore safety through two tools:
i. Mutual Purpose — “We’re in this together.”
Show that you care about their goals and outcomes.
If purposes differ, create a shared purpose by inventing options acceptable to both sides.
ii. Mutual Respect — “I value you as a person.”
When respect feels threatened, no conversation works.
Apologize sincerely if needed. Use contrast statements:
Your emotions come from the story you tell about what’s happening—not the event itself.
Event → Interpretation (“story”) → Emotion → Reaction
People naturally fill gaps with:
The fix:
The book’s core communication tool:
This expresses truth while reinforcing safety.
Use curiosity to draw out their meaning-making process.
Tools:
AMPP Skills
ABC of listening: agree where you can, build on shared areas, compare differences respectfully.
Goal: understand them well enough that they feel seen.
Crucial conversations should end with clear commitment.
Questions to answer:
Four decision models:
Pick based on urgency, stakes, and involvement.
Dialogue succeeds when people feel safe enough to express their full truth—and curious enough to hear others.
Crucial Conversations is fundamentally a blueprint for replacing defensiveness with inquiry, fear with safety, and positional fighting with collaborative problem-solving.
To understand your question, do you mean in general? Or to go into the details of how it looks to apply the ideas? In general, I'd say my advice is to read the book Crucial Conversations and the book The Fearless Organization and learn the ideas in there. How does it look? From afar, Crucial Conversations and psychological safety look like better conversations. I can't say they're perfect, but at least I avoid some pits I fell into before.