54
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
54 points (78.7% liked)
MeanwhileOnGrad
2044 readers
86 users here now
"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"
Welcome to MoG!
Meanwhile On Grad
Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!
What is a Tankie?
Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.
(caution of biased source)
Basic Rules:
Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.
Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.
Apologia — (Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.
Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.
Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.
Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post, rather than engaging in unrelated arguments.
Brigading — If you're here because this community was linked in another thread, please refrain from voting, commenting or manipulating the post in any way, this includes alt accounts. All votes are public, and if you are found to be brigading, you will be permanently banned.
You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Throw a Z on that helmet and then what do they think? Rhetorical question.
They think the same thing this is posted by anarchists not "tankies" it's possible to oppose both you know.
I really wish more people understood that saying something anti-american does not automatically make you pro-china or pro-russia. Killing people halfway across the world in countries you're not even at war with is not ok, and doing it for the money is possibly even worse. I know many are desperate, and most want to defend their country instead of shooting other poor people in some desert. But in the end, each soldier is responsible for accepting being part of that senseless violence, of being the one to pull the trigger, in exchange for money.
Instead of putting the blame on individual soldiers, how about we instead focus on the people ordering the senseless violence to begin with? When we constantly need former service members coming out and making public statements about how soldiers don't have to follow unlawful orders, doesn't that say something about the structure they've cultivated in that organization?
"Be ruthless to systems, Be kind to people."
When they are in these situations, an individual soldier is little more than an expensive weapon the people at the top are pointing at someone or something. If one of them malfunctions, they get replaced.
Yes, this doesn't absolve them of responsibility. "Just following orders" is not a defense for war crimes. But if you've watched former service members discuss how disobeying unlawful orders works, you'll know "You're asking me to do something illegal" also isn't a get out of jail free card. It is a defense for when you face punishment for violating that order. A defense crucially that can fail if the order is found to be lawful. So if you're a soldier that say comes from desperation and might be looking at losing literally everything to a dishonorable discharge if the court martial doesn't find in your favor and says that you were in fact disobeying a lawful order? Can you maybe see why someone like that might feel like they have no choice but to pull that trigger?
I'm not saying it's right. I'm not saying they don't bear some responsibility. I'm saying maybe they might bear less responsibility than the people that put them in that position to begin with and maybe we should show some goddamned compassion to people who in that impossible moment feel like they only have one way out.
I was in that original thread, and posted about Shooting and Crying being a common propaganda tactic to DARVO things and make people feel sympathetic for the soldiers. Shooting and Crying was pioneered by… Drumroll please… The IDF. So you can fuck right off with that.