this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
219 points (97.4% liked)

Flippanarchy

1778 readers
587 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cross-posted from "if the entire population just acted in a way they’ve never acted before..." by @Wheaties@hexbear.net in !chapotraphouse@hexbear.net


furryprovocateur:

literally why is gerrymandering legal. why is america the stupid idiot country.

ndiamichelle:

This could be counterproductive if people actually vote. Everywhere. We can blame the system and politicians all we want but if people don’t get off their ass to vote correctly or just vote in general that would probably solve a good chunk of our problems.

furryprovocateur:

enthralled at the interpretation of the world you have. the best way to vote out a system that exists to suppress votes and bottleneck specific populations from being heard is to vote harder. tell me more.

toloveviceforitself:

There’s a certain kind of democrat whose whole politics is basically “if the entire population just acted in a way they’ve never acted before on a level that borders on the miraculous, we could win without changing anything else about how democrats govern or campaign!” and they think that’s not only a useful insight, but a good justification for rejecting literally any alteration of their ideology, their strategy, or even suggestions that (on the occasions they have power) they alter the rigged system that requires such miracles in the first place.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If this is your reaction to seeing posts you disagree with, maybe you do need to stay defederated

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
  1. I’m not them
  2. its a commentary on advocating for censorship of content that is not harmful, just that you personally disagree with, which is reprehensible
  3. u a weenie
[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This comment seems really uncalled for. Number list format in 2025, filling it out to make three? So tacky. I have to side with the other weenie now just on pure style points. Fuck you for making me do this.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 37 minutes ago

I feel 0 remorse on using a numbered list. Why would that possibly be something that becomes outdated based on year? Does an efficient ordered presentation of data become passé because, I don’t know, some fucking dorks decided it’s lame or whatever

I don’t even care about whatever the original post was about. I will die on this hill

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you for... proving my point further?

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The points of you at either end, that kind of pucker like a convex asshole, because of being a weenie? I would say they only pointed them out, and not conclusively proved them to any high standard.