they also think just because the animal isn’t being killed that peta wouldnt be mad at it. they think peta thinks it kills them to take their wool ☠️☠️
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
75 points (95.2% liked)
Slop.
788 readers
641 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not trying to be facetious, but is it right not to let them reproduce?
Allowing them to reproduce is just perpetuating suffering in cases like this, it's not like preserving a critically endangered species where the animal could theoretically live a healthy life in the wild without constant human intervention.
I mean what's the other option given the current situation?