they also think just because the animal isn’t being killed that peta wouldnt be mad at it. they think peta thinks it kills them to take their wool ☠️☠️
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
75 points (95.2% liked)
Slop.
788 readers
641 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah. You gotta' wonder what they think wild sheep do exactly.
Not sure exactly what the point of this comment is. Domestic sheep are very different from wild sheep and leaving them to let their wool become overgrown is a pretty extreme form of neglect that will ultimately kill the animal in a slow and torturous manner. Wild sheep shed. Domestic sheep don't and also produce more wool. Now that doesn't mean there is nothing wrong with sheep husbandry but "wild sheep" have basically nothing to do with this topic.
This guy does not think there's a difference between domestic and wild sheep. Same reason a lot of people think cows just make milk all the time. Their human-made purpose is considered the default for various reasons.