this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
82 points (76.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

42932 readers
914 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nublug@piefed.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i hate the coastline 'paradox' and every other 'paradox' that's just a missing variable. "if we measure with a big resolution it's a smaller number of units and a small resolution is a bigger number!?" that's not a paradox. that's just how that variable works always. it's not confusing or interesting at all.

[–] scott@lem.free.as 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

But if you shrink the "yardstick" down to an infinitesimally small size, the length, effectively, becomes infinite... and it's the same for all coastlines. They're all infinitely long.

... but some are longer than others. ;)

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Literally no. Very hard to measure, but strictly still a finite length. Limits and all that jazz.

[–] kartoffelsaft@programming.dev -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Limits can resolve to infinity. The coastline paradox is just the observation that the (semi-reasonable) assumption that landmasses are fractal shaped implies the coastline tends towards infinity with smaller yardsticks.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

If you're going to talk about paradoxes, you should also know you're committing a presupposition fallacy

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They can.. I wasn't saying they couldn't... I meant that as to point to the logic you'd use to prove it finite

My bad for the poor wording though.

[–] MrPoopyButthole@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Max Planck says no...

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn't calculus solve this stuff?

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

Surely the distance approaches some finite value.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You can't shrink the yardstick down to an infinitesimal size.

Coastlines are not well defined. They change in time with tides and waves. And even if you take a picture and try to measure that, you still have to decide at what point exactly the sea ends and the land starts.

If the criteria for that is "the line is where it would make a fractal" then sure, by that arbitrary decision, it is infinite. However, a way better way to answer the question "where is the line" is to just decide on a fixed resolution (or variable if you want to get fancy), which makes the distinction between sea and land clearer.

It is like saying that an electron is everywhere in the universe, because of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. While it is very technically true, just pick a resolution of 1mm^3 and you know exactly where the electron is.