382
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] snipgan@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

To be fair most won’t, but they definitely can and do.

Especially when they are jaws on legs that are more inclined compared to other dogs.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yup. I've crunched the numbers before, and it's something like 1 in 10,000 pit bulls will attack a human or other companion animal every year. It's not likely for any given pit to attack a person (which I can anecdotally support–they're obnoxiously friendly and loving in my experience), but it's also like 10 times more than the next most vicious breed. In my opinion, it's not worth euthanizing every member of the breed, but it is worth neutering every one. We don't need dog breeds, especially ones responsible for over half of the violent attacks on people and other animals.

Of course, I'm in support of neutering all companion animals to reduce the stray population and ease the strain on shelters, regardless of breed or species. Breed specific laws are only one step towards fixing the larger problem.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Of course, I’m in support of neutering all companion animals to ease the stray population and the strain on shelters, regardless of breed or species. Breed specific laws are only one step towards fixing the larger problem.

Bob Barker is smiling down on you from heaven for this

[-] Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I must be unlucky because I have yet not run into one that didn't try to kill me if not for the muzzle or them being a puppy or a fence.

[-] workerONE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Don't you think that pit bull attacks are dangerous and cause medical trauma which leads to reporting of the attack? I think it's likely that they don't attack people more than any other dog breed. I was bit by a black lab mix. I didn't report it to anyone. If it had been a pit bull I probably would have needed medical attention.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

It's actually not the strongest bite. And not the only breed with a locking jaw. It is the breed with a reputation though...

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes. Built by shitty people doing shitty things to these dogs because they like that fact about them.

[-] Seraph@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

The actual issue is that's it's a degenerative disease in dogs of similar breeds. At some point they get old and less able to recognize friend from foe. That might be ok if it weren't for the jaws you mentioned.

[-] snipgan@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly.

I'd go one step farther and even say if they even had the same amount of attacks as other dogs, had no possible mental diseases, and all want to caring homes I would still put restrictions/ban on them.

They are just too large to handle, too big of a bite to brush off, and end up in dog attacks a lot. That's enough for me.

[-] Shadow@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I'm gonna need a source on that.

[-] Seraph@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Cerebellar Cortical Disintegration or Degenerative Myelopathy could exacerbate a situation.

I unexpectedly found this on the genetic mapping of aggression which seemed interesting: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977763/

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977763/

That's a great article...

However the only examples of aggression being related to breed is with Daschands and Yorkies, although the study says that's likely just to that specific gene also making legs shorter.

While there is a genetic component to aggression, it's variation is pretty standard amongst all dogs, except the tiny ones who may have accidentally been selected for it.

But someone asked you for a source for a cognitive thing and you just randomly linked an article about how breed doesn't determine behavior?

Did you know what that article was about before you linked it?___

[-] Seraph@kbin.social -3 points 1 year ago

However, it is also notable that a subset of large breeds carries the chrX reduced-fear/aggression and increased-size variants in perfect LD.

I know reading is hard, friend! I linked that as it was the most interesting thing I found while looking off there were other degenerative diseases common in pitbulls, while not being pitbull specific. Did you think me finding evidence contrary to my beliefs would result in me hiding it?

I'd give you snarky "let me Google that for you" on the degenerative diseases as they're genuinely interesting, but I guess you'll never know what they're about since you can type a comment but not use a search engine.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

People were talking about pitbulls, they average 60lbs, they're not a "subset of large breeds" like Rottweilers who average 120lbs...

You're not being coherent, just trying to jump between "gotchas".

Just randomly jumping all over

[-] Seraph@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

You're right, pitbulls are medium not large, sorry. Nevertheless the study was interesting. Again, wasn't trying to make a point with it, it was the most genuinely interesting thing I found in my short search about the subject of aggression in dogs. Sorry you don't agree.

But since you're having so much fun chatting with me:
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=Cerebellar+Cortical+Disintegration
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=Degenerative+Myelopathy

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So you still couldn't find anything that agrees with you?

Sorry, not taking the time to help you.

[-] Seraph@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I did and put those in the original comment you are being replying to. You just refused to look up anything about them. I have no desire to do your research either, ignorance suits you.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

I did and put those in the original comment you are being replying to.

You didn't tho, you have that random article you didn't read...

Although I don't know why I'd be surprised you're just making shit up now, that's all you've done so far. I have no doubt you somehow think you're "winning" whatever is you're trying to do here either.

Have fun with whatever that is I guess.

[-] Seraph@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

No one is "winning". When you wrestle with a pig you both get covered in shit, but the pig likes it.

Guess we'll both have our own perspective on that old saying.

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
382 points (91.7% liked)

World News

39033 readers
994 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS