this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
94 points (97.0% liked)

Slop.

832 readers
400 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tweet

"what do you mean the compradors at the Palestinian Authority dont care about the people in Gaza?"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 58 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The chinese cavalry aint coming to save anyone

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 34 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

i would at least hope for chinese aa systems just to fuck with seppo air superiority, but apparently china thinks you only should work with rich customers, smh. like jesus christ taiwan announces they get new fighter jets, oh look iran gets a gift from chinese ngo of 50 integrated aa systems. 1000 km missiles to phillipines? hello venezuela, would you like some anti ship missiles. but no, gotta protect your harvard failsons until you get forced to act, like russia. meow-tableflip

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 23 points 4 months ago
[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Chinese Cavalry isnt the same since Mao's death

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 26 points 4 months ago (2 children)

lol mao wasn't doing shit for international socialism since the sino soviet split. "The Cavalry" was the Soviets under Khruschev and Cuba under Fidel. That's it man. That's what we had.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wasn't Mao arming and providing training for the PLO during the 60s?

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He did plus sending 1 million soldiers to korean and vietnam war.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The vietnam he would later invade. And I don't know íf you're aware of when the Korean war and the Sino soviet split took place.

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The vietnam he would later invade.

Wow, Mao invaded Vietnam 3 years after his dead? Juche necromancy is crazy.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago

Both of our chronology being off is indeed crazy. My point remains that China has not been the go to for intervention on behalf of international communism.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago

A valid counter example that is especially relevant.

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Keld@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The DPRK did get involved but won't any longer. Not since the soviet union fell.

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I was referring to the DPRK being a part of the "cavalry" along with Cuba and the soviets.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's what I'm saying. They used to be, but they haven't been since the soviet union fell. Their entire situation is too precarious.

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago

Agreed, they shouldn't rock the boat right now. There's whispers of DPRK arms in Palestine, which is good, but more than that and they'd be in serious trouble. Increased trade with Russia and China has worked out well for them recently, they aren't in a position to put that in risk.