Privacy

2926 readers

206 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

danielintempesta@programming.dev

155

Wisconsin VPN bill is 'going to be a disaster for everyone,' says online privacy nonprofit (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 4 days ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/privacy@programming.dev

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Due to the UK's Online Safety Act implemented earlier this year, accessing my Bluesky DM's now means I need to allow a third-party service to scan my face, ID, or bank card. Understandably, that gives me the willies. So I can either simply never look at my messages again, whip out the likeness of Norman Reedus, OR I can log on via a VPN. However, the days of this vastly preferable third option may be numbered.

US states Wisconsin and Michigan have already proposed VPN crackdown bills aiming to close off this workaround—and the UK may be looking to follow suit. Online privacy nonprofit the Electronic Frontier Foundation recently criticised this strategy, taking aim at Wisconsin's bill in particular, saying that blocking the use of VPNs is "going to be a disaster for everyone."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 10 points 4 days ago (9 children)

If they block major providers then you can just setup your own

The major providers have "no logging" policies. They generate no data linking your payment information to your activity, so they have no data to turn over if requested. Your activity is traceable from the sites you visit back to the VPN's endpoint, but the no-logging policy prevents further tracing back to you.

Any VPN you setup on your own is going to be tied to you just as closely as a facial scan, ID, or bank card.

[–] apex32@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (5 children)

It depends on how the law is implemented.

If simply connecting to a VPN is illegal, then your ISP could rat you out. They can't tell what you are doing, but they can see a bunch of encrypted traffic between you and a VPN server.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If simply connecting to a VPN is illegal,

Such a law would prohibit Cloudflare's entire business model. That interpretation will never survive the courts.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You good sir underestimate the stupidity of courts

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago

The courts understand money. A handful of state legislators can't throw nearly as much money at such a case as the big names in tech. Therefore, big tech wins.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (5 replies)