this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
155 points (99.4% liked)

Privacy

2932 readers
334 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Due to the UK's Online Safety Act implemented earlier this year, accessing my Bluesky DM's now means I need to allow a third-party service to scan my face, ID, or bank card. Understandably, that gives me the willies. So I can either simply never look at my messages again, whip out the likeness of Norman Reedus, OR I can log on via a VPN. However, the days of this vastly preferable third option may be numbered.

US states Wisconsin and Michigan have already proposed VPN crackdown bills aiming to close off this workaround—and the UK may be looking to follow suit. Online privacy nonprofit the Electronic Frontier Foundation recently criticised this strategy, taking aim at Wisconsin's bill in particular, saying that blocking the use of VPNs is "going to be a disaster for everyone."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] apex32@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It depends on how the law is implemented.

If simply connecting to a VPN is illegal, then your ISP could rat you out. They can't tell what you are doing, but they can see a bunch of encrypted traffic between you and a VPN server.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If simply connecting to a VPN is illegal,

Such a law would prohibit Cloudflare's entire business model. That interpretation will never survive the courts.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You good sir underestimate the stupidity of courts

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago

The courts understand money. A handful of state legislators can't throw nearly as much money at such a case as the big names in tech. Therefore, big tech wins.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wrong end for most of us. It's not that we live in a backward-state where VPNs are illegal, it's that companies that want to do business in the state will have to block ALL users coming in through a VPN, regardless of where you live. They know which users are using a VPN because the IP blocks are well known, and they will just have to block those users. That's why this one state is trying to f- over everyone.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago

That makes more sense and is...even worse tbh because that's actually enforceable and so obvious I don't know how I missed it. That would also probably impact Tor since those IPs are already heavily reputation damaged. The stuff governments have been pulling recently is just insane