this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
16 points (86.4% liked)
Progressive Politics
3495 readers
155 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Did she say why? I don't know anything about the challenger, but Jeffries needs to go just as much as Schumer
Have looked into this more and nobody has said much of anything. And yet somehow two noncommital sentences from her and Mamdani have turned into a leftwing smear frenzy that would rival any high-school drama.
To my knowledge, Ossé's entry wasn't planned and he had previously indicated he wasn't running or wouldn't run without DSA endorsement. And even now his statement is he's "exploring" a run. And AOC/Mamdani's statements were basically "I don't think it's a good idea for him to run" which is a neutral phrasing covering any reason (good or bad), and certainly isn't an endorsement of Jeffries if the primary were to actually happen.
But if you were to read axios [parent company donated at 70% republicans/30% to establishment dems] or vox [owned by Jay Penske, son of MAGA mega-donor Roger Penske, with ties to Saudi money and Trump's Whitehouse] this is a show a fealty to the corrupt Democrat cabal and requires unrest and dissent on the left.
Good lord people, why bother with this obvious bait...
She’s trying to avoid making enemies in the party establishment, because she has been setting up for a presidential run.
But she’s going to have to sell her soul, and compromise everything she claims to believe in, in order to get there.