this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
25 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1203 readers
58 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

See our twin at Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
blakestacey@awful.systems
dgerard@awful.systems
self@awful.systems
25
Yudkowsky denies the accusations! several thousand words in, and ten years after they were made (x.com)
submitted 22 hours ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

yes, that's his high-volume account, linked from @ESYudkowsky

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 9 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Didnt the zizians also literally protest one of his events and got arrested for that? Or was that a different group they were protesting. Seems weird to not look them up at all. Very 'ideological turing test' failure levels.

Also funny that his logic would mean he doesnt look into Nelson Mandela.

E: also iffy he tosses the animal rights people (partially) under the bus for no reason. EA animal rights will love that.

[–] scruiser@awful.systems 9 points 21 hours ago

Very ‘ideological turing test’ failure levels.

Yeah, his rational is something something "threats" something something "decision theory", which has the obvious but insane implication that you should actually ignore all protests (even peaceful protestors that meet his lib centrist ideals of what protests ought to be) because that is giving into the protestors "threats" (i.e. minor inconveniences, at least in the case of lib-brained protests) and thus incentivizing them to threaten you in the first place.

he tosses the animal rights people (partially) under the bus for no reason. EA animal rights will love that.

He's been like this a while, basically assuming that obviously animals don't have qualia and obviously you are stupid and don't understand neurology/philosophy if you think otherwise. No, he did not even explain any details of his certainty about this.