this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
98 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8593 readers
215 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ah, well the sex trafficking was ok in that case

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rootsbreadandmakka@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I understand what you’re saying, but this dick sucking rumor is spelled out explicitly in the email. It’s not a completely unfounded rumour. The only real evidence against it I’ve seen people offer is that it seems like a joke, a conclusion reached by trying to read between the lines of shitty boomer communication. It is a joke or isn’t a joke based on an individual’s interpretation, meanwhile what the email says is that trump sucked bill Clinton’s cock. So even if it isn’t true, and I agree it’s a really wild and surreal possibility, I don’t really think it’s too damaging since based on the current evidence it seems like it might be true. True magaheads are gonna deny everything no matter what.

[–] Riffraffintheroom@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Honestly my reading of it was that he was saying that Trump proverbially sucked Clinton’s dick, like he was sycophantic and deferential towards Clinton. And if that’s my reading of it when I’d rather believe the opposite, manga’s definitely gonna read it that way too.

[–] rootsbreadandmakka@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago

Maybe, in which case we’re back to where we started. But I think it would be an uphill battle to get most people to read it this way. This still requires reading between the lines, and there’s no clear reason to do this rather than just reading what the email says.

[–] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago

The “Don’t write anything you don’t want to hear read in a courtroom” issue