this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

5530 readers
382 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From Historia Civilis' video, Reform or Revolution? (1830 to 1832)

https://youtu.be/h6E4_Bcmscg?t=250

The greatest thing that George IV ever did was die at the exact right time. That’s a mean thing to say, but the people at the time were way meaner.

In their obituary, The Times described their dead King, “the character of which rose little higher than animal indulgence.”

The people hated him. He was a glutton and an ostentatious spender during bad economic times.

A couple of days later, the paper couldn’t resist going back to get one last kick in, “there never was an individual less regretted by his fellow creatures than this deceased King.”

(Stop, he’s already dead!)

George had 10 children, but none with his actual wife, (you had one job, idiot) and so the Crown passed to his 64 year old brother William.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huf@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago (9 children)

IIRC william was an unusually politically savvy king.

he did his coronation on the cheap so as to ease public sentiment. and then when told "sire, the peasants are revolting", he did not say "yes, of course", but (eventually) put pressure on the conservatives to get the reform bill passed.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago (5 children)

George V was also pretty based. Essentially, the House of Lords kept rejecting the Common's bills to limit the Lords so he threatened to fill the Lords with people who won't reject it.

We've been pretty good with monarchs in recent history anyway, barring Edward VIII

Sure, you can complain about the system, but now we have a funny old man who likes nature and pedestrian based affordable towns who's worst flaw is that he cheated on his wife compared to his clownterpart across the pond who's done it several times.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I dont like the monarchy, in the same way that I dont like the BBC.

But to remove them and replace them with something far far worse? No thank you.

I'm weirdly glad that some of my taxes goes towards experimental green towns, or part of my license fee goes towards high quality educational kids shows.

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Why do we need anything "far worse"? Why not just remove them constitutionally and let them do their own thing? Smaller state and all that.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)