39
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] theKalash@feddit.ch 4 points 1 year ago

There is no indication in the article that he called her a man before she flew of the handle.

[-] Bonehead@kbin.social -5 points 1 year ago

He literally told her "i only treat women."

[-] theKalash@feddit.ch 6 points 1 year ago

Ok, so you didn't read the article.

Yes, he wrote that. As a response to the google review her boyfriend left after the encounter.

[-] Bonehead@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago

"I only treat real women" - that's what French gynaecologist Victor Acharian told a 26-year-old transgender woman he refused to treat in his clinic in the south-west of the country recently.

The transgender woman, accompanied by her boyfriend, went to a gynaecological appointment when, after minutes of waiting, the secretary told her that the doctor had refused to see her.

There's the article...

[-] theKalash@feddit.ch 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“I only treat real women” - that’s what French gynaecologist Victor Acharian told a 26-year-old transgender woman he refused to treat in his clinic in the south-west of the country recently.

Yes ... that's what we call "editorialized". He did say that, but not when he refused her treatment, but way later. You need to read the whole thing.

What actually happened (as per reading the FULL adticle):

  • Women enters doctors office

  • Doctor politley refused her and offers to refer her

  • Women throws a fit, insults staff

  • Boyfriend writes google review

  • Doctor replys with the "I only treat only real women".

This is very different from what the editorialized title and first paraghraph imply, which is

  • Women enters doctors office

  • Doctor tells her "I only treat only real women".

[-] Bonehead@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago

If the story is "editorialized", then you don't know exactly what happened just as much as I do. So your interpretation is just that...an interpretation. But we do know that the doctor was a dick about it after the fact, so he likely was a dick about it when it happened.

[-] theKalash@feddit.ch 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, we don't know what actually happened because everyone interview could have been lying. That's not the point.

The headline and first paragraph, which acts as a summary are editorialized. That means they are inentionally hyperbolic and try to make the story as "shocking" as possible, because that gives you clicks.

Unfortunatly that is all most people read as is evident by this comment section.

[-] Bonehead@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago

Just because it's a story you don't like doesn't make it shock journalism...

[-] theKalash@feddit.ch 5 points 1 year ago

True, my personal feelings about the story do in fact not change how this article was written.

[-] Bonehead@kbin.social -3 points 1 year ago

Right...instead you just "interpret" it as shock journalism...

[-] theKalash@feddit.ch 4 points 1 year ago

"identified as" would be more appropriate. But it's really almost all journalism these days.

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
39 points (62.6% liked)

Interesting Global News

2451 readers
361 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS