Libertarian Discussion

366 readers

3 users here now

Place for discussion from a Libertarian perspective, meaning less top-down control and more individual liberty. In general, the intent is discussion about issues and not a discussion on libertarianism itself or any of its branches.

Be sure to respect the instance rules, and please keep discussion civil and backed by high quality sources where possible.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works

A Senate-Approved Bill Would Ban the Hemp-Derived THC Products That Congress Legalized in 2018 (reason.com)

submitted 4 months ago by EndlessApollo@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org to c/libertarian@sh.itjust.works

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I literally just linked the first google result. Not the only research about it.

Why does it being limited mean anything? Is limited the same as non existent now, or...?

Edit: You can pick and choose quotes, but this is directly from the abstract:

In multiple experimental models, both in vitro and in vivo, several phytocannabinoids, including Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabigerol (CBG), exhibit activity against inflammation.

I honestly could not give less of a shit about your position on legalization. But to pretend that established medical uses for cannabis are just fake is ignorant as fuck.