this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
214 points (99.5% liked)

News

33127 readers
3001 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Thought one: Did they bother to legislate how cash transactions will work without it?

Congress did not. Apparently it causes issues in some states.

In some states and cities, it is illegal to round up a transaction to the nearest nickel or dime because doing so would run afoul of laws that are supposed to place cash customers and debit and credit card customers on an equal playing field when it comes to item costs. So, to avoid lawsuits, retailers are rounding down.

Per AP

It's also silly because a bill was introduced in April to answer this question, but it's just sitting around. You know how busy Congress is nowadays. (Also similar bills have come up in the past, but also just sat around and nothing became of them.)

If you'll pardon my insanity for a moment, there is something to be said for the Executive branch making a decision that the Legislative branch refused to make. The Legislative have ceded so much power to the Executive that they should be embarrassed. I wish this was front page news about political overreach. Instead it's just, "Yeah, everyone knows Congress can't do shit."

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Apparently it causes issues in some states.

… issues that would not be rendered moot by the supremacy clause of the Constitution!? If Congress passes a law saying that because the federal currency will no longer include a $0.01 denomination, all cash transactions must be (either rounded to the nearest $0.05, or must have change values in multiples of $0.05), states are obliged to follow this law. As it is, the mint will just stop making a kind of money, leaving states in the lurch, and potentially inviting lawsuits from state attorneys general.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, they would be rendered moot IF (and hopefully when) Congress passes a law.

The last penny was minted today. Companies have already begun to struggle with a lack of pennies.

This isn't a problem that will happen if Congress does nothing. This is a problem that is happening because Congress did nothing.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly! TBH, I’m surprised. The GOP’s God King said, “make it so,” and they haven’t done his bidding. The one time their spineless adherence to anything Trump wants could’ve actually been popular, and we get nothing. An astonishing level of incompetence! For shits and giggles, a Democrat should push for the bill to be taken up, just to watch the GOP leadership shoot it down because they can’t take credit for it. An official “not like that.”

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

That's the crazy part, they did, back in April!

https://mcclain.house.gov/2025/4/mcclain-garcia-lummis-gillibrand-introduce-bipartisan-bill-to-end-penny-production

Two US House members, one Democrat and one Republican, and two US Senators, one Democrat and one Republican introduced the bill.

The bill isn't even that long, https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3074/text

That's an easy bipartisan win. I'm not against having a few committee's review it and getting everything in order... But six plus months for something this simple?!

The "must pass" legislation gets slapped together over a weekend and everyone complains that they don't get time to read it. They post all over social media a towering bill full of last minute margin changes.

But no one has taken time to move forward a two page pamphlet in six months?

It's truly mind boggling.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

We're long overdue for an Amendment to bar one branch from ceding its power to another. Biggest catch to that is that it may reinforce the recent ruling on deference. Someone like Trump writing detailed regulations is about as scary as Congress doing it.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Personally I kinda wish that power that Congress refuses to wield shouldn't be pushable to the executive but instead decays back to the states. Basically cedeing power to the presidency should be effectively impossible, but power decaying back to the states should be the norm.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Basically cedeing power to the presidency should be effectively impossible, but power decaying back to the states should be the norm.

I can't wait for the yanks to rub in my face that "AcKsHuAlLy, MeDiCaL mEtH iS lEgAl In WeSt ViRgInIa" while ignoring that women initiating divorce is illegal in idaho.

EDIT: maybe I fucked it up, but it's already intolerable when shitheads brag about "The USA has legal weed" when it's in certain states with many restrictions, and ignore all the shit that other states ban, like abortion. Or, permit, like child marriage.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Honestly this is at least one of my reasons for trying to reignite regional nationalism. Some states are backwards shitholes deserving of a harrowing while others are semi functional if flawed modern states.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Honestly the entire districting system should be dropped in favor of statewide party list voting.

Gerrymandering has ensured that every district is like a dick shaped blob on every map and your local rep might live further from you than the nearest 3 other reps.