this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
69 points (100.0% liked)

news

24696 readers
678 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sodium_nitride@hexbear.net 24 points 4 months ago (2 children)

In September, the country released its latest climate targets, to cut overall greenhouse gas emissions by between 7% and 10% of their peak by 2035.

Experts say those targets are too modest to stave off global catastrophe and a long way from the 30% cut that is feasible and necessary.

But China has a record of underpromising and overdelivering on climate targets

Although a baseline target of 7-10 pc is too low indeed, China is definitely pulling its weight in achieving climate goals because of how much solar energy they have sold to the rest of the world at bargain prices, not to mention the long term research they put into making this possible.

And of course, China is basically 5 years ahead of its target in reaching peak emissions. Saying that they will only cut down 7-10 pc emissions in 10 years is clearly a modest statement, given the rate of growth in solar, wind, hydro and nuclear energy. Not to mention, China’s property boom is being wound down, giving even more room for lower emissions.

[–] Runcible@hexbear.net 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

China is definitely pulling its weight in achieving climate goals because of how much solar energy they have sold to the rest of the world at bargain prices, not to mention the long term research they put into making this possible.

well that and no one else actually doing anything to cut emissions

[–] sodium_nitride@hexbear.net 31 points 4 months ago

Some countries are. For example, Europe is cutting emissions using the strategy of deindustrialisation.