this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
47 points (94.3% liked)

Selfhosted

52912 readers
1172 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey,

I know it sucks to rely on cloud services but it is what it is. I use Apple iCloud, Bitwarden and GitHub.

Technically, I could self-host all three but I want my backups not at my place or at least have them in both places cloud/at home.

I do have two spare Raspberry Pi Zero 2W and one small computer with an old i5 / 8 GB RAM.

What do you personally self-host?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] myplacedk@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I own my data. I own my installation. That's what I care about.

Why would I want to own the hardware, when it's in an inaccessible building far away.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We host most stuff at home, and then additionally some services at Hetzner on an (auctioned) root server. Bloody nice to get really good hardware for cheap, plus unlimited data with either 1 or 10Gbit synchronous network speed, a dedicated IPv4,...

Stuff like my mail server lives there because it HAS to be available, and doing it at home, and doing it well, is next to impossible.

I'm planning a nix hydra + cache server, which will probably also live on the Hetzner server, simply because it'll have pretty intense jobs to run a lot of the time and I'm not a fan of having the noise of spun-up fans at home.

Both solutions have their place, is what I'm saying / agreeing.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

We can end-to-end encrypt mail but dudes are out here raw dogging VPSs like it’s 1998.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More like: paying someone to maintain the hardware.

Anyways.

Just FYI, your mails with a provider like Proton are not E2E encrypted unless you exclusively wrote with other Proton customers (in which case I assume they are. No idea). Otherwise it's just encrypted at rest.

I dint really see the benefit over doing it completely yourself, not even offering metadata to a provider, and also having encryption at rest, while maintaining full compatibility with mail clients 🤔

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, and I do werether the recipient also knows how to use it.

So, for like, 1% of my mails.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

Their computer, their data.