this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
394 points (97.4% liked)

PC Gaming

12673 readers
833 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 67 points 3 days ago (6 children)

As long Valve doesn’t become publicly traded they will be fine. The problems start when companies optimize for shareholder value rather than customer value.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 35 points 3 days ago

Private equity buyout would be the same problem but even faster.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

So tencent or a saudi prince buys them and it will be fine guyyyyssss haha

Nothing ever bad happens under private ownership either right?

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 18 points 3 days ago

You think there aren't a bunch of greedy finance whores biding their time until Gabe dies in order to take over and enshitify everything so they can squeeze as much money out of Steam as possible?

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Na. Even privatly traded companies can enshittify when it gets inherited to people not sharing the same vision as the one that made the company successful.

If you want to prevent enshittification more long term, convert it to a non-profit cooperative, with a work ethic that promotes providing the best service over short term profit.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

That would be amaze balls, but hard to see happening in reality.

How cool would it be if Steam split* into a non-profit, giving rebates back to developers for platform fees collected in excess of costs (including generous salaries for their employees, of course) with directives to make the platform as good for gamers and developers as possible?

One can dream.

  • I'm assuming a split because game development and sales don't really mesh with a non-profit in the same way. Hard to make competitive multiplayer-only live-service games (let alone The International for DOTA 2) and loot crates your business model that way, at any rate.
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago

You're right that going public would virtually guarantee they enshittify, but staying private does not guarantee they remain customer focused. It's still a business, and right now the only thing making it so good for customers, IMHO, is an ideological vision that favours long term stability, and steady profits. That is not the norm in the business world (of tech platforms).

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 days ago

Well yeah, that will be the potential first sign to look out for. If that happens no need to think it won't get worse like everything else.