this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
278 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26336 readers
3421 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The chair is basically a dictator, 100% power, 0% accountability.

Ha, someone made them dictator and the DNC needs money. Just wait. A status-quo candidate will be pushed by corps and billionairs. I'm betting they'll push Pete Buttigieg.

But I hope you're right, AOC would be amazing.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

and the DNC needs money

Literally the opposite...

Billionaire owned media is fearmongering because the DNC isn't currently raising money, but they have the keys to the "victory fund" and we're like 9 months deep into the biggest reinvestment from the DNC to state parties ever.

The DNC doesn't need money, certainly not as much as they currently have 3 years out from a presidential election.

Just wait. A status-quo candidate will be pushed by corps and billionairs.

100%. It would be incredibly naive to think otherwise.

But money ain't enough to get a neoliberal past the primary. That's why since 2008 the neoliberals consolidated more and more power into the DNC that they never anticipated losing...

But they did

Just like the de-regulation of broadcast regulations allowed billionaires and corps to buy up every journalistic institution, and then it immediately blew up in neoliberals faces, making a strong DNC has fucked them because they lost control of it.

But I hope you’re right, AOC would be amazing.

I pay more attention than most, and have hated the DNC for 30+ years.

Martin won't influence it either way. And neoliberals are so unpopular the only way they can get past the primary is a long sustained propaganda movement to convince people the DNC is worthless to depress primary turnout.

No matter what happens, we need to get people to vote in primaries. We can't afford someone like Newsome or Pritzker making it to the general and then the oval, because they'll name a chair that'll never let go of power.