this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
88 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24091 readers
181 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It says that the power output is about the same as the US Navy’s S6W reactor at about 200 megawatts.

I did some googling and it seems that the most powerful diesel engines, which are most common for commercial shipping, land at around 80 MW. So if it’s more practical to build and use thorium reactors on commercial ships (not just the most advanced Navy ships) the I think it’s got to change the game at least economically right? Not just speed, but other factors like eliminated need to refuel at ports (which can take days, but maybe that happens during downtime anyway). For military application that’s a key benefit too.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah the thing I was thinking here was like, if you increase speed you also increase overall efficiency of movement. 2 days faster shipping across an entire fleet of ships is a massive increase in the total amount you ship if something is usually a 20 day journey.

Just pulling numbers out of the air obviously.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 days ago

Also have to consider how much the parts can handle stress wise on if adding power