this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
128 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

774 readers
545 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

She holds a BA in history from Chadron State College and an MA in history from the University of Nebraska–Lincoln (UNL).

So she’s more of a historian than say, Anne Applebaum or Dan Carlin. But less of a historian than… actual historians. No teaching position, no academic papers, etc

I’m not trying to be a snob about credentials, but there is a huge gulf between someone who has a BA in history and someone who has a PhD from a legit program. MAs can be good but there’s not really much of a standard there (Mike Duncan has an MA in history and IIRC he has enough respect for the work to not call himself a historian formally).

The reality is that a rigorous PhD program will teach you about how to research and analyze properly. The kind of research that would help prevent you from making brain dead takes like this one that most historians - even anti-communist ones - wouldn’t make.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That is not true lol. Literally read anything by Sarah Paine, and she has a doctorate from Columbia. PhD's will have brain-dead takes.

[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Timothy Snyder, too. Lots of bad historians but I would still argue those are the exception rather than the rule.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago

Lol fair enough.

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So the only thing I have to say to that is, if we posted Alaskaball's great post about the purges to AskHistorians to ask about the historical accuracy, would they take it seriously and engage with it or would they just call it Stalinist tankie propaganda and dismiss it out of hand?

Based of what I saw on there when I was doing reddit regularly, my money's on the latter. And I knwo there are PhDs there. They have a pretty high standard for who is even allowed to provide top level answers, and they answers agave to be well cited.