this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
48 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
775 readers
534 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I guess I still get stuck on when posting a convo I was involved in crosses a line into being a personal vendetta. I shared a screenshot (as a comment, not a post itself) recently of a single comment with a horrid take from a thread I participated in. Is the fact that I replied to the comment enough to make that a vendetta? If my replies had been meaner would that have made it a vendetta? If I had screenshotted more of the convo and included my replies regardless of how mean they are?
If I repeatedly post that particular user, or purposefully follow them around to argue with them and post it, that seems like it would clearly cross that line, but what if I happen to run across another bad take by them without seeking it out? What if they start following me around to argue?
It seems like the “safe” side of that rule would be for me to not have posted about them at all since I did more than read their post.