Data Is Beautiful

9033 readers

1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

satur@lemmy.ml

otter@lemmy.ca

cirrokumulus@slrpnk.net

qaz@lemmy.world

Qaz@lemmy.ml

449

Contradictions in the Bible (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 weeks ago by ooli3@sopuli.xyz to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem is the abundance of assholes using selected parts of the Bible to manipulate others while conveniently ignoring other parts of the Bible that contradict them.

This has absolutely nothing to do with contradictions or lack thereof, though. You can just as easily cherry-pick something that has no contradictions.

That's non-sequitur.

[–] FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Disagree. If the document was completely logical & self-supporting, then there'd be no need to cherry pick as anything said would be consistent with the whole. You could highlight certain aspects, but that's not cherry-picking.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If the document was completely logical & self-supporting, then there’d be no need to cherry pick as anything said would be consistent with the whole.

You're assuming that the entire document has a single message, which is absolutely not a given. Simple hypothetical:

If the Bible said nothing more than these things:

Abortion is bad
You should tithe 10% of your income to the church
The earth is 6000 years old

And you were someone who was on board with the first two but not the third, it'd be cherry-picking to call yourself an adherent of the Bible while citing your belief/agreement in/with the first two while ignoring the third, even though none of the three things above contradict each other.