this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
669 points (97.0% liked)

science

23116 readers
292 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That doesn’t make it pointless.

There is something to be learned from this. Using a control would answer a different question.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Using a control group would tell us if there's any gain from the supplements whatsoever, was basically my point. For the average person using supplements doesn't do much for weight gain as far as I hear, so that's why I was asking what kind of people these subjects were, if they were athletes or regular people doing weight training. So, it does matter.

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And, my point is that calling this research pointless is just wrong because it answers à different question.

I’m not disagreeing that the question that you want answered should be studied. It should. But, the fact that this research doesn’t answer your question doesn’t make it pointless.

It’s perfectly valid research to study whether the results are different between animal-based and plant-based supplements. I didn’t go through the citations but they say:

Recent evidence suggests that both animal and plant proteins support strength and hypertrophy gains when paired with resistance training and adequate protein intake

which sounds like the research you’re asking for has already been done.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Alright, valid points from both sides. 🤝