this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
247 points (99.6% liked)

Climate

8220 readers
947 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DeadPixel@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That’s a really good read! Very positive despite certain groups trying to keep fossils relevant to milk profits a while longer, fuck em, hope this really is the turning point that clean energy takes the lead…

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think this might be an unpopular take, but I think we -- and I'm talking about activists and ecosocialists here -- should be advocating for a just transition away from fossil fuels in places like Russia.

Reading the article, my first thought was gleeful schadenfreude. The people responsible for Russia's coal industry are frankly monsters. They have so much blood on their hands for the human toll they have imposed on the climate, but also because they're authoritarian war-mongers. And seeing them hoisted by their own petard is a wonderful thing to see.

But then my second thought was this: the workers in this industry are suffering badly, and will suffer worse. They are in an economic crisis that is getting worse, and ruled over by oligarchs who amplify all their suffering.

And then my third thought was of revolution. As much as we hate to admit it, revolution in the real world is a value-neutral proposition. In the face of awful circumstances, it's hard to imagine the outcome of a revolution not being better. But that's just a failure of imagination. This kind of event fuels revolution, but there's no guarantee that such a revolution won't simply move to another form of exploitation and barbarism. If we want the workers of Russia to be able to live lives of dignity and comfort, and we want the whole world to decarbonize as fast as possible, then I think that Russia needs access to the technologies and ideas that provide that. My point is that we should begin advocating for tech transfer.

Tech transfer to a regime like Putin's? I don't love it. But I think it needs considered.