this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
289 points (88.7% liked)

News

23360 readers
2114 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Lyft is introducing a new feature that lets women and non-binary riders choose a preference to match with drivers of the same gender.

The ride-hailing company said it was a “highly requested feature” in a blog post Tuesday, saying the new feature allows women and non-binary people to “feel that much more confident” in using Lyft and also hopefully encourage more women to sign up to be drivers to access its “flexible earning opportunities.”

The service, called “Women+ Connect,” is rolling out in the coming months. Riders can turn on the option in the Lyft app, however the company warns that it’s not a guarantee that they’ll be matched with a women or non-binary person if one of those people aren’t nearby. Both the riders and drivers will need to opt-in to the feature for it work and riders must chose a gender for it to work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lol no.

Equity in this case is providing additional opportunities for education to those who need it.

[–] JasSmith@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Equity in this case is providing additional opportunities for education to those who need it.

That would be equality. Everyone given the same opportunity to benefit from resources on the basis of need. Equity would be providing additional resources to people on the basis of race, for example, irrespective of their need. The purpose of which to ensure outcomes are equitable.

[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Again, no.

Equity is explicitly about need. Equality is irrespective of need. This is literally the definition I gave at the start of this discussion.

Obviously to enact equitable policies, you can't handle things on a case-by-case basis, because that doesn't scale. You have to find metrics that correlate with need. The only policies that scale are those that target cohorts rather than individuals.

In the example of school funding, reasonable cohorts can be derived from income level and relatedly (for historical reasons in the US) race.

  • An equitable policy would be to provide additional school funding to impoverished communities.
  • An equal policy would be to provide the same funding to all communities.
  • An unequal policy would be to provide funding in accordance with something inversely proportional to need, like property value.
  • An oblivious policy would be to provide funding in accordance with something orthogonal to need, like the day of the week.

In the case of ride-share safety for both riders and drivers, gender is a decent axis for defining cohorts.

[–] darq@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe I am missing this in the article but which education is being provided by Lyft?

You gave an example of a school. It's really obvious that the above poster was addressing the example that you gave.

[–] JasSmith@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

That wasn't clear to me but thanks for clarifying. I'll edit my comment above.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you are providing additional X to a subset of people it is by definition not equality. The two are jot compatible.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If the two people didnt start in the exact same place then they were already unequal though. So the equity option just makes them closer to equal, equality is not measured in simply 'how much you get for free'. I work with people with disabilities getting more 'free' support than you or I will ever see, are they more equal than the rest of us for it?

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is literally the distinction between equality and equity. There are different words that mean close to similar things.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because the goal is equality of outcome. Like I said equality between people is not measured in "how much stuff you are given"