Technology

59456 readers

3931 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

234

Unity backtracks slightly on plans to charge developers for game installs (www.eurogamer.net)

submitted 1 year ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Game development engine Unity has U-turned on some parts of its hugely controversial plan to enforce fees on game creat…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MudMan@kbin.social 85 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think people realize how horrifying these addendums are.

Not only do they not really fix the issue, but they prove that no, yeah, they hadn't thought about the possibility of "install bombing" at all until just now and it would totally have triggered massive fees.

I mean, the announcement was terribly worded, and some of the stuff (like wha't a "monthly fee" or a "retroactive fee") were very unclear, so you could hold out hope that they knew what they wanted to do and were just bad at explaining it.

But nope, that ship has sailed. They clearly didn't give this any amount of thought.

So yeah, I'm more worried about it now than I was yesterday, believe it or not. Like, a LOT more.

[–] visor841@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah this feels like Wizard of the Coast's first response to the OGL drama. Make some changes that are technically better than the first terrible system, but is ultimately still completely unacceptable. WotC eventually had to walk back everything, we'll see if Unity does the same.

[–] MudMan@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, they have to.

But honestly at this point that's not even enough. You know they tried, you know whatever need for cash they were trying to fulfill remains. It's one thing to let that go when buying a piece of software that you just... have, but building an entire business on top of this middleware and knowing you have a business relationship with them indefinitely as a result?

At this point it's a dealbreaker. You can't trust them again. If I start a new dev studio tomorrow Unity would not even be in the running to start choosing an engine. They made themselves into a liability overnight. It's stunning. I don't know what the hell they're putting in the filtered, flavored water they sell to executives, but this year has been an endless chain of self-immolation I had never witnessed before.

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Not to mention the OGL stuff was only a risk to 3PP as a lawsuit of WoTC decided to act on it. This debacle is a direct attack on the bottom lines of games publishers that will kill independent development and seriously hamper even AAA companies. I know I'm not going to waste my time learning it.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sure the CEO put plenty of thought in how much they could cash out before destroying the company and moving on to the next company to destroy

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

He comes from EA, I'm not surprised