electoralism

Then how can you not understand saving someone's life, someone whose material circumstances makes them a likely socialist, is not part of a grand process?

Did I say mutual aid wasn't part of the process? You made assumption about my "standard" not resulting in "conquest of state power" and I corrected you by calling it a process and now you're talking about how I don't include mutual aid in that process, which is another assumption???

You're shadow boxing with a phantom in your head and I'm catching strays, all because I called out your over-the-top expectation for other people, I wasn't making a value judgment on the concept of mutual aid itself

I was explaining the basis of what good mutual aid looks like, and it is rarely about the money

Again, I understand what you're saying, but I'm not an anarchist, under a capitalist system it's always about the money, I'm disagreeing with your theory and I said didn't want to get into it because I didn't want to make this sectarian

It is best to directly house people if you want to use a lot of money efficiently and effect people in the most profound ways.

The state can do that better than idealistic social expectations

This is a skill issue on your part and on the part of society

It's a skill issue because you don't have state power, that's my point