this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
84 points (100.0% liked)

news

24696 readers
737 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dead@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago

Q: U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated that whether the United States would impose additional 100% tariffs on Chinese products depended on China, and he expressed his belief that there was still a chance to resolve the dispute over restrictions on critical minerals. What is China’s response? Have other countries sought clarification regarding China’s new rare earth export control measures?

A: I would like to emphasize that since the China-U.S. economic and trade talks in Madrid, and despite China’s repeated dissuasion, the United States has, in just over 20 days, rolled out 20 measures to suppress China. These measures have seriously harmed China’s interests and undermined the atmosphere of the bilateral trade discussions. In particular, at the end of September, the U.S. introduced a so-called Affiliates Rule for its Entity List under export controls, effectively expanding the list to cover thousands of Chinese enterprises. Moreover, on October 1, disregarding China’s sincere efforts to engage in consultations, the U.S. persisted with the implementation of port fees on Chinese shipbuilders under its Section 301 investigation—causing significant harm to China’s interests and producing extremely negative repercussions.

China expresses strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to this series of U.S. actions. We hope the United States value the outcomes achieved in the economic and trade talks, immediately rectify its wrong practices. China stands ready to work with the U.S. on the basis of mutual respect to properly address each side’s concerns through equal-footed dialogue.

Prior to announcing its export control measures, China had already notified relevant countries and regions—including the United States—through bilateral export control dialogue mechanisms, clarifying the policy’s objectives to minimize misunderstandings or misjudgments. Some countries and regions have expressed understanding and their willingness to engage actively in communication and cooperation with China on this matter, as they are doing currently.

https://xcancel.com/MOFCOM_China/status/1978822341573419384#m