this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
569 points (99.1% liked)

Android

32594 readers
68 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sfjvvssss@lemmy.world 94 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I hope they also enhance their social media strategy, as their unprofessional and aggressive way of communication makes me question their trustworthiness more than I want, as I think the project is awesome.

[–] Arondeus@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm out of the loop. Any examples of this?

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 51 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

They shit on other projects all the time (frequently unprovoked, sometimes without the original conversation having anything to do about security). They also often reply with multiple posts with multiple paragraphs each when shitting on other projects. It shouldn't take very long to find an example if you trawl through their replies on Twitter, Bluesky, or Mastodon.

They have good points, but they're often either not relevant to the conversation or worded in such a way that it sounds like every project other than GrapheneOS is dogshit.

They also sometimes go on (IMO) paranoid rants about XYZ project systematically trying to destroy them or whatever.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I got the same vibes when they describe in detail how supposedly terrible Firefox on Android is for security. I actually didn't believe them just based on the tone.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean, I think they're right that the security is worse. I'm pretty sure it's worse on desktop too, just not nearly as bad. Last I checked, Firefox on Android still doesn't do per-site process isolation by default, for example.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Yes that is what they said. But the way they said it made me doubt that it matters quite so much.

[–] newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure it’s worse on desktop too

worse than what? What browser is better?

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Blink-based ones (Chrome/Chromium, Edge, Brave, Vivaldi, etc.)

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Somehow I don't believe you when you say that those browsers are better for security.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not gonna bother looking up references, but security and privacy are two different things (since I'm assuming that's what you're implying).

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, fair enough

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Reminds me of our good friends on Lemmygrad.

[–] newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago

it's called effortposting

[–] berber@feddit.org -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

wasn't that in the pqst? wasn't that just the guy who started it or sonethinf? isn't that person off the team now?

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If you're talking about Daniel Micay, he's still heavily involved. I'm pretty sure he still maintains the accounts since they haven't really changed writing style or anything. IIUC though he's no longer the main dev.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 11 points 2 months ago

That's what I've been thinking as well, remember having a conversation with him in a forum a few years ago and recently looked up something that had a comment from the official GrapheneOS account. The writing style was exactly the same. Kinda disappointing IMO, the dude is clearly a brilliant coder but he should be kept away from the official accounts as far as possible.

[–] berber@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

yes i meant daniel micay. ah okay didn't know he was heavily involved. by "the accounts" i assume you are referring to social media accounts?

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the social media accounts.

[–] sfjvvssss@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

If you want a direct example you can check their replies on Mastodon to about every topic.

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 months ago

Yep. They need an actual comms professional. I love GOS and am forever grateful to the team but having a bunch of non-nuero-typical devs speaking for them is not doing them any favours.

[–] nfreak@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago

Seriously. I love GOS and can't imagine using a phone without it at this point, but their social media is a shitshow and a half.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

For me, it would be the opposite. Their "unprofessional" and aggressive way of communications makes me think they are doing it for convictions rather then personal benefits. The person that's helping you doesn't need to be overly polite. The person trying to get something out of you does.

[–] sfjvvssss@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I got heavily attacked for basically nothing like a year ago, which made me feel really bad and I still think about it frequently. Whoever treats people like this does not gain a lot of trust from me. Also such impulsiveness should not be involved in such a project. No one needs to be overly polite but also not that hostile against people and like 90% of other projects out there.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Sorry, maybe I just did not see how bad it gets. I don't follow their communications in detail. I wanted to say that being a bit aggressive is fine, but if it was really to the point of attacking you, than that is not ok either.