this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
84 points (98.8% liked)
Texas
2380 readers
3 users here now
A community for news, current events, and overall topics regarding the state of Texas
Other Texas/US Lemmy Communties to follow
Sports
- Houston Astros
- Houston Texans
- Houston Rockets
- Texas Rangers
- Dallas Cowboys
- Dallas Stars
- Austin FC
- San Antonio Spurs
Rules (Subject to Change)
-
Be a Decent Human Being
-
Posting news articles: Please use exact article Titles
-
Posts must have something to do with Texas
-
Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
-
No NSFW content
-
Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Cool, no one's suggesting we get rid of codes and standards for traffic signs and markers. I guess that's why I said it was a straw man. If you're not too busy touching grass, you can respond to Baron Von J's actual argument which is that nobody is mistaking a rainbow colored crosswalk for anything other than a crosswalk.
If you don't like arguing online maybe try not jumping into the middle of one throwing expletives around?
That's literally what's being argued. There are standards for traffic signs and markers, and the gov is just demanding to actually adhere to them. Though his motivation is nefarious, the logic is still sound.
If you want to argue against that, you are arguing for the dissolution of said standards because "they'll figure it out".
This is not complicated.
If anything, the argument is that we'd like to add to traffic signs and markers by making them more visible.
Hmmm that's really weird because according to this study,
So let's see some data from you on how removing the rainbows from crosswalks will "support traffic control or safety".