this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
833 points (98.4% liked)

LGBTQ+

4119 readers
220 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 46 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Just because something is obvious doesn't mean it's right.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It wasn't until the 1900s that Principal Mathematica was written in order to derive fundamental axioms that can be used to derive all other mathematic principles.

This is the book that people often partially joke about it being the first exhaustive proof that 1+1=2.

I guess my point is also the compliment to your point. Even things that are right are not always obvious.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think your point is actually "even things that are right and obvious are not always obviously right" or something like that. It's obvious to all of us that 1+1=2, and it is correct, but it isn't correct because it's obvious. It just happens to be both obvious and correct, but for very different reasons.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Probably. Because I read what you said and agree. Maybe I said it badly.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Do you mean Principia Mathematica?

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah. Auto correct or dyslexia. I like to blame autocorrect.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 4 points 3 days ago