this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
202 points (99.0% liked)

World News

50244 readers
1739 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world -4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They should release them. They might not survive but at least they'll have a chance.

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's the equivalent of releasing toddlers into a swamp.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Or even an adult who has never gone camping being dropped in the middle of Alaska, the Amazon, or the Ghobi desert. Odds of survival are low and they are gonna suffer from starvation, thirst, getting sick from eating/drinking from the wrong sources, or being prey to something they don't know how to avoid. Maybe all four!

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Hell, you could release such an adult where I live in NW Florida. Very forgiving ecosystem yet even I wouldn't last a month.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The alternative is the equivalent of shooting the toddlers in the back of the head.

Either way is horrible.

[–] rozodru@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Release them where exactly? someone still has to pay to move them somewhere to be released. I mean you can't just let them loose in Niagara Falls unless you want 30 Beluga Whales falling on top of the Maid of the Mist.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It's funny how they didn't have any problem paying the huge expense of bringing them there but suddenly money is scarce when it is time to take care of them or brigning them back.

They should be legally required to pay to fix it. To me this is no different than an oil company having to pay to cleanup whenever they make a spill.

[–] CuffsOffWilly@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not much different than euthanizatiom except for the cost of shipping them to a release site.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Not necessarily. These animals can be acclimatized and eased into it in stages to give them a fighting chance. Even if the chance of success is slim, I still fully expect the assholes who decided to breed these animals in captivity to be financially liable to cover the cost of that.

Otherwise, whoever owns these animals should be legally bound to financially support them until they die of old age. If someone decides to breed sentient creatures in captivity they should know that they can't just discard them like an old newspaper if that doesn't turn out to be a good investment.