this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
134 points (81.9% liked)

Firefox

21021 readers
511 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Firefox app on android. Never seen this before until today. But Firefox is now putting ads in the app?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's not that bad, IMO.

That being said, you sould 100% be using Cromite if you're on android. Not only is its adblocking/antifingerprinting basically state-of-the-art, but its (unfortunately) way faster than firefox.

Killing sideloading might kill it though...

[–] FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Just checked out cromite... Had AdbluckPlus in it... Uninstalled it.. Sorry but i dont want a adblocker from a company on my phone...

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

It uses a modified version of its engine and its own filter source. It's not commercial ABP: https://github.com/uazo/cromite/blob/master/docs/ADBLOCKING.md

Why was AdBlock Plus used rather than uBlock?

ADB is developed in c++ while uBlock is an extension in javascript. Currently, support for extensions is not active in Android. ADB in Cromite is enhanced with support for cname uncloaking and blocking even in workers (a unique feature of Cromite). Support for "acceptable ads" has been completely removed.

I view this as a huge plus, as (theoretically) a C++ engine is faster than a javascript one.