this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
275 points (95.1% liked)

Privacy

42291 readers
624 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Whenever people ask about ways to make their smartphones more private or which is the most privacy-respecting phone to get, there's always a few people confidently asserting "all smartphones are spy tools, get a dumbphone with no apps if you want to be private". Which is ridiculous advice for a few reasons

  • Dumbphones usually run either proprietary operating systems or outdated forks of Android. They're almost never encrypted. They rarely get security updates. They're a lot more vulnerable than even a regular Android phone

  • With dumbphones, you're usually limited to regular phone calls or SMS/MMS messaging. These are ancient communication standards with zero built-in privacy. Your ISP can read any text message you send and view metadata logs of any phone calls you make. In lots of places (like Australia where I live) ISPs are actually required to keep logs of your messages and phone calls

With even a regular Android phone you at least have access to encrypted messaging apps like Signal or Session so your conversations aren't fair game for anyone who wants to read them. Of course there are better options. iOS (not perfect but better than most bloatware-filled Android devices) and a pixel with GrapheneOS (probably the best imo) are much better options; but virtually anything out there is going to be better for privacy than a dumbphone

Edit: Thanks everyone for giving your thoughts. Some really good points I hadn't thought much about

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 12 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I always thought people used the term "dumbphone" to refer to old-fashioned devices that are just a phone and don't run any OS.

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

even all old Nokias and flipphones and the like have an OS they're just in house developed proprietary embedded software/firmware not open sourceish like android

its how almost any sufficiently complicated device that uses PCBs works even modern washing machines and such run atleast what it basically a firmware os

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Landlines, you mean? I sometimes forget they still exist.

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Even a wireless handset landline or a deskphone with functions such as an address book and call history would have a basic firmware OS, but something like rotary phone wouldn't

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

A world where communication devices are limited to rotaries phones, CLI only terminals that only allow data transfer as SMTP, FTP and BBS traffic over dial-up using acoustic couplers connected to the rotaries handsets, would be a better world

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Evil commies want to force you to touch grass, beware!
First they came for the gamers

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unacceptable. I want to be able to telnet.

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Ok but the only server you can connect to is that one that plays that ASCII version of star wars in the term

telnet towel.blinkenlights.nl for anyone who hasn't experienced this masterpiece

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No MUDs? That's what I used telnet for.

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

I can live with that.

[–] tlmcleod@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I dunno about better, but it would certainly be a hell of a lot slower. A lot of websites would revert to text only, so perhaps it would be better lol

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

What web? Gopher and FTP.

[–] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Even a lot of offices have moved to VoIP.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

How do you think they worked? All cells always had an OS.