this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
56 points (98.3% liked)

Slop.

830 readers
436 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This was shared with me by a well-meaning Trump-hating lib boomer in my life and is a pretty perfect little example of why this "Borowitz Report" sucks shit. It's a fully libbed up wannabe Onion but it has absolutely no sauce.

The point the article is going for is "ha ha look at how unhinged Trump's UN speech was, what an absurd and terrible guy he is" but the comparison point it picks is Hugo Chavez's 2006 speech to the UN. This made me curious as to what exactly it was he said back in 2006. A quick little jaunt over to NATOpedia got me some choice quotes:

"The devil came here yesterday, and it smells of sulfur still today, this table that I am now standing in front of."

followed by

"Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, the President of the United States, the gentleman to whom I refer as the devil, came here, talking as if he owned the world."

and

Chávez also said that President Bush "...came [to the General Assembly] to share his nostrums to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world."

Bars, no lies detected, etc. Certainly not "batshit." And of course Borowitz picked this example comparing Trump to Chavez while Trump is currently in the process of trying to manufacture a Gulf of Tonkin style incident with Venezuela.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)
[–] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That fucking rules. God damn Chavez was the greatest.

[–] CommCat@hexbear.net 7 points 6 months ago

He really was great, people don't underestimate the important role he played for the International Leftist movement. The Left still felt defeated with the collapse of the Soviet Union, and still living in the period of "End of History". Sure there were movements like the Zapatistas, but they were hidden in the little area, doing mostly local things, but no real Leftist held state power and defied US Empire, until Chavez came along.

[–] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 8 points 6 months ago

peltier-laugh

also, TIL nostrum:

  1. A medicine or remedy in conventional use which has not been proven to have any desirable medical effects.

  2. (by extension) An ineffective but favorite remedy for a problem, usually involving political action.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago

That's some good shit

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: