755
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Gsus4@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

It's perfectly fine to deplatform selectively anyone who is trying to threaten, intimidate, harass others. You don't automatically get freedom of speech if you don't follow society's rules of coexistence between groups.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com -1 points 1 year ago

Lemmy and distributed systems like it are designed to prevent any one group to get deplatformed.

If a group of people are breaking laws, judges should sanction them. It shouldn't be up to corporations to remove their voice. If any one group can remove the voice of another group, no matter how righteously, without legal due process then we are just having a popularity contest.

[-] Gsus4@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In this case in particular, depends whether he broke their terms of service, which is by itself more arbitrary than the law :/ I don't think the guy did, so maybe he can win in court :)

By the way, if you break the rules in your instance, you gettin' banned, so Lemmy is the same. The cool thing about it is that the rules vary from instance to instance and you should know what they are before you federate with them or open an account there.

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
755 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59081 readers
3484 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS