this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
70 points (100.0% liked)
technology
24030 readers
348 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I do feel like this is impossible, since I dont think an LLM could ever give a 100% correct response, and how to determine something is correct also seems wishy washy. I've seen an LLM that gives multiple possibilities and tbh I didn't like using it since each possibility was a ton of slop to read through and I felt like I could just do the thing myself faster than read through each possibility and verify its correctness. So in Xing's article, he is kind of right when he says that when LLM's admit uncertainty, people tend to use it less (which maybe would be a good thing!).