this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
197 points (99.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8526 readers
211 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

The first amendment doesn't protect them from their advertisers. Unilever and coke don't want their names attached to anything that pisses off 1/3rd of the country. Its the same reason YouTube is so sanitized now.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

This was apparently the FCC chair, threatening them with retribution. That is illegal.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Can we please stop pretending anyone who matters gives a single shit about the law?

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's become a glaring example of "Rules for thee, not for me."

Always was, just more thee now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)